State v. Martin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Martin

916 A.2d 47, 281 Conn. 901, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 19

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 4, 2007·No. SC 17802·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn. App. 458 (AC 25823), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*902 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17802. C. Robert Satti, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Arthur L. Ledford, special public defender, in opposition. Decided January 4, 2007

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence of the crimes of attempt to possess one kilogram or more of marijuana with the intent to sell, possession of four ounces or more of marijuana, and conspiracy to violate the drug laws?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn. App. 458 (AC 25823), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*902 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17802. C. Robert Satti, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Arthur L. Ledford, special public defender, in opposition. Decided January 4, 2007

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence of the crimes of attempt to possess one kilogram or more of marijuana with the intent to sell, possession of four ounces or more of marijuana, and conspiracy to violate the drug laws?”

State v. Martin, 916 A.2d 47, 281 Conn. 901, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 19 (Colo. 2007).

Pincite

916 A.2d 47 (State v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related