State v. Marshall
This text of 117 R.I. 999 (State v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion of State to affirm the judgment below pursuant to Rule 16(g) is denied.
Case is assigned to the calendar for April 6, 1977, 9:30 a.m., for oral argument. The defendant will be expected to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed, since his appeal is to the trial justice’s denial of .a motion to suppress and he has cited no cases for the proposition that at a suppression hearing the State must prove that the seized article was in the plain view of the officer who first saw it. Bevilacqua, C.J. not participating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 R.I. 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marshall-ri-1977.