State v. Marshall

Nevada Supreme Court

State v. Marshall

19 Nev. 240

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1885

DocketNo. 1224

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 Nev. 240 (State v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Marshall, 19 Nev. 240 (Neb. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Belknap, C. J.:

Appellant was convicted of the crime of manslaughter upon an indictment charging him with murder. The only exception arises upon the order of the district court denying a motion for a continuance of the cause, made upon the ground of the absence of one of the witnesses for the defendant. The affidavit upon which the motion is based is fatally defective in this: it fails to show that there are not other persons by whom the defendant could prove the same facts that he expected to prove by the absent witness.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Belknap, C. J.:

Appellant was convicted of the crime of manslaughter upon an indictment charging him with murder. The only exception arises upon the order of the district court denying a motion for a continuance of the cause, made upon the ground of the absence of one of the witnesses for the defendant. The affidavit upon which the motion is based is fatally defective in this: it fails to show that there are not other persons by whom the defendant could prove the same facts that he expected to prove by the absent witness.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Nev. 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marshall-nev-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack