State v. Marshall

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Marshall

476 S.W.3d 307, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1062, 2015 WL 6161236

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 20, 2015

DocketED 102162

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 476 S.W.3d 307 (State v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Marshall, 476 S.W.3d 307, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1062, 2015 WL 6161236 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Marshall appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by jury of kidnapping and domestic assault in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Marshall appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by jury of kidnapping and domestic assault in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2015).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 S.W.3d 307, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1062, 2015 WL 6161236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marshall-moctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack