State v. Marshall

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Marshall

439 S.W.3d 851, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 957, 2014 WL 4290447

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 2, 2014·No. No. ED 99633·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, John Marshall, appeals the judgment and sentence entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of three counts of unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of section 571.070 RSMo. (Supp.2013). The trial court sentenced the defendant to concurrent sentences of seven years of imprisonment each on counts I and II, plus a consecutive sentence of two years on count III. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, John Marshall, appeals the judgment and sentence entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of three counts of unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of section 571.070 RSMo. (Supp.2013). The trial court sentenced the defendant to concurrent sentences of seven years of imprisonment each on counts I and II, plus a consecutive sentence of two years on count III. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Marshall, 439 S.W.3d 851, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 957, 2014 WL 4290447 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

439 S.W.3d 851 (State v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.