State v. Marshall

27 S.W. 1107, 124 Mo. 483, 1894 Mo. LEXIS 308
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided November 5, 1894·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Sherwood, J.

The defendant being indicted for a felonious assault, after several continuances on the part of the state, moved to be discharged. The lower court granted his motion and discharged him, and from this order of discharge the state has appealed. Into the correctness of this order we can not look, as the state has no right of appeal in such cases. It is only when the “indictment is quashed, or adjudged insufficient upon demurrer, or when judgment thereon is arrested” (R. S. 1889, secs. 4289, 4290), that the state is allowed an appeal. State v. Risley, 72 Mo. 609; State v. Heisserer, 83 Mo. 692; State v. Ashcraft, 95 Mo. 348. In consequence of these statutory provisions, this appeal having been improvidently taken, must be dismissed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Marshall, 27 S.W. 1107, 124 Mo. 483, 1894 Mo. LEXIS 308 (Mo. 1894).

27 S.W. 1107 (State v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brooks
372 S.W.2d 83 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1963)
State v. Dickson
1958 OK CR 111 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1958)
State v. Peck
271 P. 707 (Montana Supreme Court, 1928)
State v. Wear
46 S.W. 1099 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)