State v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Marshall

291 N.W.2d 703, 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1385

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 18, 1980·No. No. 49508·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, Minn. Stat. § 609.342(a) (1976) and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum term of 20 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant contends (1) that his conviction should be reversed outright on the ground that the evidence of his guilt was legally insufficient, or (2) that at least he should be given a new trial on the ground that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain other-crime evidence. There is no merit to either contention, and we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, Minn. Stat. § 609.342(a) (1976) and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum term of 20 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant contends (1) that his conviction should be reversed outright on the ground that the evidence of his guilt was legally insufficient, or (2) that at least he should be given a new trial on the ground that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain other-crime evidence. There is no merit to either contention, and we affirm.

Affirmed.

State v. Marshall, 291 N.W.2d 703, 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1385 (Mich. 1980).

Pincite

291 N.W.2d 703 (State v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related