State v. Marshall
This text of 291 N.W.2d 703 (State v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, Minn. Stat. § 609.342(a) (1976) and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum term of 20 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant contends (1) that his conviction should be reversed outright on the ground that the evidence of his guilt was legally insufficient, or (2) that at least he should be given a new trial on the ground that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain other-crime evidence. There is no merit to either contention, and we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
291 N.W.2d 703, 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marshall-minn-1980.