State v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Marshall

196 N.W. 819, 158 Minn. 529, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 912

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 25, 1924·No. No. 23,578·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of the manufacture of intoxicating liquors contrary to an ordinance of Minneapolis. The trial was to the court without a jury. The only question is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a finding of guilty. We have examined it. There was evidence in proof of the defendant’s guilt, and evidence in disproof of it. A finding either way would be sustained and there is no profit in reviewing the testimony.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of the manufacture of intoxicating liquors contrary to an ordinance of Minneapolis. The trial was to the court without a jury. The only question is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a finding of guilty. We have examined it. There was evidence in proof of the defendant’s guilt, and evidence in disproof of it. A finding either way would be sustained and there is no profit in reviewing the testimony.

Judgment affirmed.

State v. Marshall, 196 N.W. 819, 158 Minn. 529, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 912 (Mich. 1924).

Pincite

196 N.W. 819 (State v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related