State v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Marshall

196 N.W. 819, 158 Minn. 529, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 912

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 25, 1924

DocketNo. 23,578

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 N.W. 819 (State v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Marshall, 196 N.W. 819, 158 Minn. 529, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 912 (Mich. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of the manufacture of intoxicating liquors contrary to an ordinance of Minneapolis. The trial was to the court without a jury. The only question is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a finding of guilty. We have examined it. There was evidence in proof of the defendant’s guilt, and evidence in disproof of it. A finding either way would be sustained and there is no profit in reviewing the testimony.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of the manufacture of intoxicating liquors contrary to an ordinance of Minneapolis. The trial was to the court without a jury. The only question is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a finding of guilty. We have examined it. There was evidence in proof of the defendant’s guilt, and evidence in disproof of it. A finding either way would be sustained and there is no profit in reviewing the testimony.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 N.W. 819, 158 Minn. 529, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marshall-minn-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack