State v. Marshall

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Marshall

520 A.2d 1072, 1987 Me. LEXIS 624

DecidedFebruary 6, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 520 A.2d 1072 (State v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Marshall, 520 A.2d 1072, 1987 Me. LEXIS 624 (Me. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Jeffrey Lee Marshall appeals from a conviction of four counts of unlawful sexual [1073]*1073contact, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255 (Supp.1986), following a jury trial in Superior Court, Kennebec County. He contends that the trial justice failed to investigate properly an incident of alleged juror misconduct. Upon review of the record, we find no abuse of discretion on the part of the presiding justice in the conduct of his investigation and no error in his determination that no misconduct had occurred. Accordingly, the entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Jeffrey Lee Marshall appeals from a conviction of four counts of unlawful sexual [1073]*1073contact, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255 (Supp.1986), following a jury trial in Superior Court, Kennebec County. He contends that the trial justice failed to investigate properly an incident of alleged juror misconduct. Upon review of the record, we find no abuse of discretion on the part of the presiding justice in the conduct of his investigation and no error in his determination that no misconduct had occurred. Accordingly, the entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

520 A.2d 1072, 1987 Me. LEXIS 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marshall-me-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack