State v. Marshall Lane Scruggs
This text of State v. Marshall Lane Scruggs (State v. Marshall Lane Scruggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE FILED JUNE 1997 SESSION August 15, 1997
Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) APPELLEE, ) ) No. 01-C-01-9608-CR-00375 ) ) Sumner County v. ) ) Jane F. Wheatcraft, Judge ) ) (Revocation of Community Corrections ) Sentence) MARSHALL L. SCRUGGS, ) ) APPELLANT. )
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:
Pamela E. Beck John Knox Walkup Assistant Public Defender Attorney General & Reporter 117 East Main Street, Suite 2C 500 Charlotte Avenue Gallatin, TN 37066 Nashville, TN 37243-0497 (Appeal Only) Daryl J. Brand Nancy B. Meyers Assistant Attorney General Assistant Public Defender 450 James Robertson Parkway 117 East Main Street, Suite 2C Nashville, TN 37243-0493 Gallatin, TN 37066 (Trial Only) Lawrence Ray Whitley District Attorney General OF COUNSEL: 113 Main Street Gallatin, TN 37066-2803 David A. Doyle District Public Defender Dee D. Gay 117 East Main Street, Suite 2C Assistant District Attorney General Gallatin, TN 37066 113 Main Street Gallatin, TN 37066-2803
OPINION FILED:________________________________
AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20
Joe B. Jones, Presiding Judge OPINION
The appellant, Marshall L. Scruggs (defendant), appeals as of right from a judgment
of the trial court revoking his community corrections sentence and requiring him to serve
the sentence previously imposed by the court. In this Court, the defendant contends the
trial court abused its discretion by revoking his probation.
This is the second community corrections revocation in this case. The record
reflects the defendant violated the terms of his house arrest. He was subsequently
arrested for underage consumption of alcohol, driving while under the influence, and
driving while his license was suspended. He was convicted of DUI and the other two
charges were retired.
After a thorough review of the record, the briefs submitted by the parties, and the
law governing the issue presented for review, it is the opinion of this Court that the
judgment of the trial court should be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of
Criminal Appeals Rules.
____________________________________________ JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE
CONCUR:
______________________________________ WILLIAM M. BARKER, JUDGE
______________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Marshall Lane Scruggs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marshall-lane-scruggs-tenncrimapp-1997.