State v. Marshall

21 Iowa 143
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedJune 28, 1866
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 21 Iowa 143 (State v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Marshall, 21 Iowa 143 (iowa 1866).

Opinion

Dillon, J.

x. bond: baiI' The questions made upon the demurrer were waived by answering over and going to trial. The only question presented by the record is, whether a bail bond, otherwise in due form, is sufficient to create a liability which does not describe or designate the offense with which the principal is charged any more definitely than by the use of the word “seduction.” The District Court held the bond sufficient. It is contended by the appellants that seduction is not a crime, but there, must be a debauching as well, and the female must be of previously chaste character. This is all true, but the bail bond is not an indictment, and need not contain the particulars requisite in an indictment. In our opinion the offense was sufficiently designated. See Rev., §§ 4968 4979, 4651, 4867; 2 Whart. Or. Law, §§ 2672, 2675.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marmaduke v. People
45 Colo. 357 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1909)
Territory of New Mexico v. Minter
14 N.M. 6 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1907)
Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Thacker v. Conner
1906 OK 70 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1906)
State v. Murphy
48 P. 628 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1897)
State v. Edgerton
12 R.I. 104 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1878)
State v. Birchim
9 Nev. 95 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1873)
Hannah v. Wells
4 Or. 249 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Iowa 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marshall-iowa-1866.