State v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Marshall

973 A.2d 661, 292 Conn. 911, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 308

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Marshall. Read the opinion of the Court — 303 Conn. 933 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 17, 2009·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn. App. 178 (AC 28068), is denied.

*912 Alice Osedach, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. James A. Killen, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 17, 2009

VERTEFEUILLE and McLACHLAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn. App. 178 (AC 28068), is denied.

*912 Alice Osedach, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. James A. Killen, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 17, 2009

VERTEFEUILLE and McLACHLAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

State v. Marshall, 973 A.2d 661, 292 Conn. 911, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 308 (Colo. 2009).

Pincite

973 A.2d 661 (State v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related