State v. Marshall
697 A.2d 361, 241 Conn. 925, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 255
This text of 697 A.2d 361 (State v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Marshall, 697 A.2d 361, 241 Conn. 925, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 255 (Colo. 1997).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 66 (AC 14408), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the trial court’s admission of the two videotapes of the accusing child witness and the testimony of the six other witnesses as constancy of accusation evidence was proper?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Marshall
717 A.2d 1224 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
697 A.2d 361, 241 Conn. 925, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marshall-conn-1997.