State v. Marshall
697 A.2d 361, 241 Conn. 925, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 255
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 66 (AC 14408), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the trial court’s admission of the two videotapes of the accusing child witness and the testimony of the six other witnesses as constancy of accusation evidence was proper?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Marshall, 697 A.2d 361, 241 Conn. 925, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 255 (Colo. 1997).
697 A.2d 361 (State v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Marshall
717 A.2d 1224 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)