State v. Marshall
506 A.2d 1035, 199 Conn. 244
Opinion
After examining the record on appeal and after considering the briefs and the arguments of the parties, we have concluded that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted. The issues have been fully considered in the opinion of the Appellate Court; State v. Marshall, 3 Conn. App. 126, 485 A.2d 930 (1985); and it would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion therein contained.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Marshall, 506 A.2d 1035, 199 Conn. 244 (Colo. 1986).
506 A.2d 1035 (State v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edwards v. Commissioner of Correction
868 A.2d 125 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2005)
State v. Rozmyslowicz
726 A.2d 142 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1999)
State v. Kari
608 A.2d 92 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)
State v. Kelly
580 A.2d 520 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1990)