Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Marshall

State v. Marshall

506 A.2d 1035, 199 Conn. 244
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 25, 1986
Docket12692
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 506 A.2d 1035 (State v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Marshall, 506 A.2d 1035, 199 Conn. 244 (Colo. 1986).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After examining the record on appeal and after considering the briefs and the arguments of the parties, we have concluded that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted. The issues have been fully considered in the opinion of the Appellate Court; State v. Marshall, 3 Conn. App. 126, 485 A.2d 930 (1985); and it would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion therein contained.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. Commissioner of Correction
868 A.2d 125 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2005)
State v. Rozmyslowicz
726 A.2d 142 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1999)
State v. Kari
608 A.2d 92 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)
State v. Kelly
580 A.2d 520 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 A.2d 1035, 199 Conn. 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marshall-conn-1986.