State v. Marrero

6 N.E.3d 1201, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1463
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 22, 2014
Docket2014-0524
StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.E.3d 1201 (State v. Marrero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Marrero, 6 N.E.3d 1201, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1463 (Ohio 2014).

Opinion

Lorain App. No. 12CA010282, 2014-Ohio-553. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Review of appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction reveals that it fails to comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. 7.03(B), which requires that a memorandum “shall not exceed fifteen numbered pages, exclusive of the certificate of service.” Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the memorandum in support of jurisdiction is stricken and appellant shall file an amended memorandum in support of jurisdiction within 15 days. Failure to timely file an amended memorandum in support of jurisdiction will result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution.

It is further ordered by the court that appellee’s memorandum in response is due within 30 days of the filing of appellant’s amended memorandum in support of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Marrero
2014 Ohio 553 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.E.3d 1201, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marrero-ohio-2014.