State v. Marquis

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Marquis

684 A.2d 709, 239 Conn. 934, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 446

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 29, 1996

DocketSC 15559

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 684 A.2d 709 (State v. Marquis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Marquis, 684 A.2d 709, 239 Conn. 934, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 446 (Colo. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 186 (AC 13373), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“May a trial court, in exercising its discretion under State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 (1988), and General Statutes § 54-86g, take into account the fact that the state’s motion is supported by expert testimony and, therefore, order the child witness to be examined by the defendant’s expert?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 186 (AC 13373), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“May a trial court, in exercising its discretion under State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 (1988), and General Statutes § 54-86g, take into account the fact that the state’s motion is supported by expert testimony and, therefore, order the child witness to be examined by the defendant’s expert?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

684 A.2d 709, 239 Conn. 934, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marquis-conn-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack