State v. Marquis

684 A.2d 709, 239 Conn. 934, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 446
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 29, 1996·No. SC 15559·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 186 (AC 13373), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“May a trial court, in exercising its discretion under State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 (1988), and General Statutes § 54-86g, take into account the fact that the state’s motion is supported by expert testimony and, therefore, order the child witness to be examined by the defendant’s expert?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Marquis, 684 A.2d 709, 239 Conn. 934, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 446 (Colo. 1996).

684 A.2d 709 (State v. Marquis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Marquis
699 A.2d 893 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)