State v. Marquis
684 A.2d 709, 239 Conn. 934, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 446
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 186 (AC 13373), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“May a trial court, in exercising its discretion under State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 (1988), and General Statutes § 54-86g, take into account the fact that the state’s motion is supported by expert testimony and, therefore, order the child witness to be examined by the defendant’s expert?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Marquis, 684 A.2d 709, 239 Conn. 934, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 446 (Colo. 1996).
684 A.2d 709 (State v. Marquis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Marquis
699 A.2d 893 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)