State v. Marks

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Marks

591 So. 2d 356, 1991 La. App. LEXIS 3783, 1991 WL 245489

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 23, 1991

DocketNo. K91-919

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 591 So. 2d 356 (State v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Marks, 591 So. 2d 356, 1991 La. App. LEXIS 3783, 1991 WL 245489 (La. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

WRIT DENIED: Dilaudid is a narcotic drug, see La.R.S. 40:961(23) and R.S. 40:964 Schedule II(A)(1)(1), and the proper sentencing provision for Dilaudid is La.R.S. 40:967(B)(1). We note that our decision in this matter differs from that reached in State v. Jenkins, 573 So.2d 218 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990) and the footnote in State v. Cutrera, 558 So.2d 611 (La.App. 1 Cir.1990). We respectfully disagree with those decisions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WRIT DENIED: Dilaudid is a narcotic drug, see La.R.S. 40:961(23) and R.S. 40:964 Schedule II(A)(1)(1), and the proper sentencing provision for Dilaudid is La.R.S. 40:967(B)(1). We note that our decision in this matter differs from that reached in State v. Jenkins, 573 So.2d 218 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990) and the footnote in State v. Cutrera, 558 So.2d 611 (La.App. 1 Cir.1990). We respectfully disagree with those decisions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 So. 2d 356, 1991 La. App. LEXIS 3783, 1991 WL 245489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marks-lactapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack