State v. Markle

266 S.W.3d 880, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1535, 2008 WL 4700714
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Markle. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 990
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 2008·No. WD 68258·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Markle appeals from his conviction in the Circuit Court of Jackson County of one count of class B felony assault in the first degree. In his sole point on appeal, Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on that count, asserting that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he knowingly attempted to kill or cause serious injury to the victim. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by sufficient evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Markle, 266 S.W.3d 880, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1535, 2008 WL 4700714 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

266 S.W.3d 880 (State v. Markle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.