State v. Markham

Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity

State v. Markham

1 Tenn. 66

CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity

DecidedSeptember 6, 1804

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tenn. 66 (State v. Markham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Markham, 1 Tenn. 66 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1804).

Pincite

Opinion

Objected, that it ought not to be granted, unless upon affidavit of the prosecutor.

The Attorney general admitted the practice, and that it was necessary for the state to lay some ground for a continuance. Upon which an affidavit of the prosecutor was produced, shewing that the witness had been bound to appear, and that he was absent on account of sicknes, as he was informed.

The cause was continued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Objected, that it ought not to be granted, unless upon affidavit of the prosecutor.

The Attorney general admitted the practice, and that it was necessary for the state to lay some ground for a continuance. Upon which an affidavit of the prosecutor was produced, shewing that the witness had been bound to appear, and that he was absent on account of sicknes, as he was informed.

The cause was continued.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Tenn. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-markham-tennsuperct-1804.