State v. Mark T.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Mark T.

199 A.3d 561, 330 Conn. 962

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 16, 2019·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 186 Conn.App. 285, 199 A.3d 35 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly reject the defendant's claim that he is entitled to a new trial due to the trial court's rulings, in violation of his constitutional right to present the defense of parental justification, precluding certain testimony by the self-represented defendant and a key state's witness pertaining to that defense?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 186 Conn.App. 285, 199 A.3d 35 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly reject the defendant's claim that he is entitled to a new trial due to the trial court's rulings, in violation of his constitutional right to present the defense of parental justification, precluding certain testimony by the self-represented defendant and a key state's witness pertaining to that defense?"

State v. Mark T., 199 A.3d 561, 330 Conn. 962 (Colo. 2019).

Pincite

199 A.3d 561 (State v. Mark T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related