State v. Mark

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Mark

109 So. 3d 368, 2013 WL 1200280, 2013 La. LEXIS 674

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 13, 2013

DocketNo. 2013-KK-0556

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 109 So. 3d 368 (State v. Mark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mark, 109 So. 3d 368, 2013 WL 1200280, 2013 La. LEXIS 674 (La. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 511-923; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2013-K-0318.

Writ granted. We find no clear abuse of the trial court’s broad discretion in ruling on the motion for a continuance. La. C.Cr.P. art. 712; State v. Reeves, 06-2419, p. 73 (La.5/5/09), 11 So.3d 1031, 1078; State v. Ordonez, 395 So.2d 778, 782 (La.1981).

JOHNSON, C.J., would deny the writ. HUGHES, J., concurs in the granting of the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 511-923; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2013-K-0318.

Writ granted. We find no clear abuse of the trial court’s broad discretion in ruling on the motion for a continuance. La. C.Cr.P. art. 712; State v. Reeves, 06-2419, p. 73 (La.5/5/09), 11 So.3d 1031, 1078; State v. Ordonez, 395 So.2d 778, 782 (La.1981).

JOHNSON, C.J., would deny the writ. HUGHES, J., concurs in the granting of the writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 3d 368, 2013 WL 1200280, 2013 La. LEXIS 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mark-la-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack