State v. Mark

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Mark

109 So. 3d 368, 2013 WL 1200280, 2013 La. LEXIS 674

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 13, 2013·No. No. 2013-KK-0556·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 511-923; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2013-K-0318.

Writ granted. We find no clear abuse of the trial court’s broad discretion in ruling on the motion for a continuance. La. C.Cr.P. art. 712; State v. Reeves, 06-2419, p. 73 (La.5/5/09), 11 So.3d 1031, 1078; State v. Ordonez, 395 So.2d 778, 782 (La.1981).

JOHNSON, C.J., would deny the writ. HUGHES, J., concurs in the granting of the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 511-923; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2013-K-0318.

Writ granted. We find no clear abuse of the trial court’s broad discretion in ruling on the motion for a continuance. La. C.Cr.P. art. 712; State v. Reeves, 06-2419, p. 73 (La.5/5/09), 11 So.3d 1031, 1078; State v. Ordonez, 395 So.2d 778, 782 (La.1981).

JOHNSON, C.J., would deny the writ. HUGHES, J., concurs in the granting of the writ.

State v. Mark, 109 So. 3d 368, 2013 WL 1200280, 2013 La. LEXIS 674 (La. 2013).

Pincite

109 So. 3d 368 (State v. Mark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related