State v. Mariani

217 P. 4, 126 Wash. 55, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 1083
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 6, 1923
DocketNo. 17915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 217 P. 4 (State v. Mariani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Mariani, 217 P. 4, 126 Wash. 55, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 1083 (Wash. 1923).

Opinion

Pemberton, J.

— The appellant was convicted by a jury of the crime of being a jointist. The testimony shows that three paid investigators purchased liquor for themselves and others, at various times, at the boarding and rooming house of appellant. It is the contention of appellant that the testimony of these paid investigators, commonly known as stool-pigeons, being contradicted by appellant and his witnesses, is not sufficient to sustain the verdict.

The weight of this evidence and the credibility of these witnesses were questions for the jury to determine. State v. Kichinko, 122 Wash. 251, 210 Pac. 364; State v. Hessel, 112 Wash. 53, 191 Pac. 637.

The judgment is affirmed.

Main, C. J., Fullerton, Parker, and Tolman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Frost
234 P. 1021 (Washington Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 P. 4, 126 Wash. 55, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 1083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mariani-wash-1923.