State v. Maria

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Maria

556 S.W.3d 675

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 25, 2018

DocketWD 80746

StatusPublished

This text of 556 S.W.3d 675 (State v. Maria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Maria, 556 S.W.3d 675 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

*676Mr. Omar Maria appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence, following a jury trial, by the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, for assault of a law enforcement officer and armed criminal action. Mr. Maria claims the trial court plainly erred in failing to sua sponte declare a mistrial or instruct the jury to disregard allegedly improper closing argument by the State that was not objected to by Mr. Maria at trial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

*676Mr. Omar Maria appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence, following a jury trial, by the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, for assault of a law enforcement officer and armed criminal action. Mr. Maria claims the trial court plainly erred in failing to sua sponte declare a mistrial or instruct the jury to disregard allegedly improper closing argument by the State that was not objected to by Mr. Maria at trial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 S.W.3d 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maria-moctapp-2018.