State v. Marcus McCrary
This text of State v. Marcus McCrary (State v. Marcus McCrary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT JACKSON
MAY 1997 SESSION FILED July 2, 1997
Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk MARCUS McCRARY, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 02C01-9701-CR-00002 Appellant, ) ) SHELBY COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. W. FRED AXLEY, STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) JUDGE ) Appellee. ) (Post-conviction)
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:
RICHARD F. VAUGHN CHARLES W. BURSON 1928 - 100 N. Main Attorney General & Reporter Memphis, TN 38103 DEBORAH A. TULLIS Asst. Attorney General 450 James Robertson Pkwy. Nashville, TN 37243-0493
WILLIAM L. GIBBONS District Attorney General
ALANDA HORNE Asst. District Attorney General 201 Poplar Ave. -- 3rd Floor Memphis, TN 38103
OPINION FILED:____________________
AFFIRMED -- RULE 20
JOHN H. PEAY, Judge OPINION
The petitioner pled guilty to one count of voluntary manslaughter for which
he received a plea bargained sentence of six years to be served consecutively to a prior
sentence. He subsequently filed for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance
of counsel, and that his guilty plea was not entered knowingly and voluntarily because he
thought his six year sentence was going to be served concurrently with the prior
sentence. After a hearing, the court below denied relief finding “no substantial evidence
that [the petitioner’s lawyer] failed to consult with and advise [him] with a reasonable
exercise of professional discretion” and that her “performance fell well within the
acceptable range of competency for lawyers in criminal cases.” The court below further
found that the petitioner’s guilty plea “was knowingly made and that adequate measures
were employed to assure the protection of [his] constitutionally guaranteed rights.” Upon
our review of the record, we find that the evidence does not preponderate against the
lower court’s findings. Accordingly, the judgment below is affirmed in accordance with
Rule 20 of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee.
_________________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, Judge
CONCUR:
______________________________ GARY R. WADE, Judge
______________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Marcus McCrary, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marcus-mccrary-tenncrimapp-2010.