State v. Marchena
This text of 663 So. 2d 685 (State v. Marchena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order suppressing evidence is affirmed. However, the trial court erred in dismissing the case in conjunction with granting the motion to suppress where no motion to dismiss was pending. See State v. Leyva, 599 So.2d 691 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Therefore, that portion of the suppression order dismissing the charge is stricken. The cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
663 So. 2d 685, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12435, 1995 WL 704729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-marchena-fladistctapp-1995.