State v. Marcell
985 P.2d 238, 163 Or. App. 115, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1606
Opinion
At oral argument the state conceded that none of the alleged predicate offenses could be used to support the racketeering conviction. See State v. Harris, 157 Or App 119, 967 P2d 909 (1998). We accept the state’s concession.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to vacate judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Marcell, 985 P.2d 238, 163 Or. App. 115, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1606 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).
985 P.2d 238 (State v. Marcell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Harris
967 P.2d 909 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1998)