State v. Maples
62 S.E.2d 52, 232 N.C. 732, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 614
Opinion
Tbe judgment of tbe court below dismissing defendant’s ■purported appeal from tbe county court must be affirmed on authority of S. v. King, 222 N.C. 137, 22 S.E. 2d 241; S. v. Miller, 225 N.C. 213, 34 S.E. 2d 143; and S. v. Farrar, 226 N.C. 478, 38 S.E. 2d 193. Since tbe court below bad no jurisdiction to bear tbe appeal, we have none. Shepard v. Leonard, 223 N.C. 110, 25 S.E. 2d 445. Therefore, we have mo authority, on this appeal, to entertain defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Maples, 62 S.E.2d 52, 232 N.C. 732, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 614 (N.C. 1950).
62 S.E.2d 52 (State v. Maples) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Stallings
66 S.E.2d 822 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)