State v. Maples

62 S.E.2d 52, 232 N.C. 732, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 614
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 29, 1950·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee OuRiAM.

Tbe judgment of tbe court below dismissing defendant’s ■purported appeal from tbe county court must be affirmed on authority of S. v. King, 222 N.C. 137, 22 S.E. 2d 241; S. v. Miller, 225 N.C. 213, 34 S.E. 2d 143; and S. v. Farrar, 226 N.C. 478, 38 S.E. 2d 193. Since tbe court below bad no jurisdiction to bear tbe appeal, we have none. Shepard v. Leonard, 223 N.C. 110, 25 S.E. 2d 445. Therefore, we have mo authority, on this appeal, to entertain defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment.

Appeal dismissed.

JOHNSON, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Maples, 62 S.E.2d 52, 232 N.C. 732, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 614 (N.C. 1950).

62 S.E.2d 52 (State v. Maples) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Stallings
66 S.E.2d 822 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)