Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Manuel T.

State v. Manuel T.

200 A.3d 189, 330 Conn. 968
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 31, 2019
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 200 A.3d 189 (State v. Manuel T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Manuel T., 200 A.3d 189, 330 Conn. 968 (Colo. 2019).

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 186 Conn.App. 51, 198 A.3d 648 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court apply the proper standard in determining that, in a criminal prosecution for sexual abuse of a child, hearsay statements made during a forensic interview of the child complainant are admissible under § 8-3 (5) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding from evidence certain screenshots of text messages?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Manuel T.
337 Conn. 429 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2020)
State v. Freddy T.
200 Conn. App. 577 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 A.3d 189, 330 Conn. 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-manuel-t-conn-2019.