State v. Manuel T.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Manuel T.

200 A.3d 189, 330 Conn. 968

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 31, 2019·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 186 Conn.App. 51, 198 A.3d 648 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court apply the proper standard in determining that, in a criminal prosecution for sexual abuse of a child, hearsay statements made during a forensic interview of the child complainant are admissible under § 8-3 (5) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding from evidence certain screenshots of text messages?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 186 Conn.App. 51, 198 A.3d 648 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court apply the proper standard in determining that, in a criminal prosecution for sexual abuse of a child, hearsay statements made during a forensic interview of the child complainant are admissible under § 8-3 (5) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding from evidence certain screenshots of text messages?"

State v. Manuel T., 200 A.3d 189, 330 Conn. 968 (Colo. 2019).

Pincite

200 A.3d 189 (State v. Manuel T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related