State v. Mansion

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Mansion

207 So. 3d 389

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 29, 2016

DocketNo. 2016-KK-1371

StatusPublished

This text of 207 So. 3d 389 (State v. Mansion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mansion, 207 So. 3d 389 (La. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

I tin these consolidated matters the trial court, after a preliminary hearing, found no probable cause as to defendant Kemp and found probable cause as to defendant Mansion.

The appellate court affirmed the finding of no probable cause as to defendant Kemp and reversed the trial court’s finding of probable cause as to defendant Mansion, thus finding no probable cause existed for the arrest of both defendants.

We reverse and find that probable cause has been shown for the arrest of both defendants, for the reasons assigned by Dysart, J.

KNOLL, J., would deny. CRICHTON, J., dissents and would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

I tin these consolidated matters the trial court, after a preliminary hearing, found no probable cause as to defendant Kemp and found probable cause as to defendant Mansion.

The appellate court affirmed the finding of no probable cause as to defendant Kemp and reversed the trial court’s finding of probable cause as to defendant Mansion, thus finding no probable cause existed for the arrest of both defendants.

We reverse and find that probable cause has been shown for the arrest of both defendants, for the reasons assigned by Dysart, J.

KNOLL, J., would deny. CRICHTON, J., dissents and would deny.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 So. 3d 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mansion-la-2016.