State v. Mansaw

109 P.3d 1211, 279 Kan. 309, 2005 Kan. LEXIS 152
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided April 22, 2005·No. No. 90,340·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

Dana J. Mansaw appeals his conviction in Wyandotte County of possession of cocaine, K.S.A. 65-4160(a). A unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Mansaw, 32 Kan. App. 2d 1011, 93 P.3d 737 (2004). We granted Man-saw’s petition for review.

Mansaw contends the trial court erred (1) in denying his motion to suppress evidence found during the search incident to his arrest; (2) in finding sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction; and (3) in concluding Mansaw’s statutory right to a speedy trial had not been violated.

We have carefully reviewed the entire record and conclude the Court of Appeals’ opinion adequately addressed the issues and reached the correct conclusion on each of the three issues. We, therefore, adopt the opinion of the Court of Appeals and affirm both the Court of Appeals and the district court. See Supreme Court Rule 7.042(c) and (f) (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 51).

[310] Gernon, J., not participating. Larson, S.J., assigned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mansaw, 109 P.3d 1211, 279 Kan. 309, 2005 Kan. LEXIS 152 (kan 2005).

109 P.3d 1211 (State v. Mansaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Foster
493 P.3d 283 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2021)
State v. Gilliland
490 P.3d 66 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2021)
State v. Bennett
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2018
State v. Bogguess
268 P.3d 481 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2012)