State v. Mansaw

Supreme Court of Kansas

State v. Mansaw

109 P.3d 1211, 279 Kan. 309, 2005 Kan. LEXIS 152

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedApril 22, 2005

DocketNo. 90,340

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 109 P.3d 1211 (State v. Mansaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mansaw, 109 P.3d 1211, 279 Kan. 309, 2005 Kan. LEXIS 152 (kan 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

Dana J. Mansaw appeals his conviction in Wyandotte County of possession of cocaine, K.S.A. 65-4160(a). A unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Mansaw, 32 Kan. App. 2d 1011, 93 P.3d 737 (2004). We granted Man-saw’s petition for review.

Mansaw contends the trial court erred (1) in denying his motion to suppress evidence found during the search incident to his arrest; (2) in finding sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction; and (3) in concluding Mansaw’s statutory right to a speedy trial had not been violated.

We have carefully reviewed the entire record and conclude the Court of Appeals’ opinion adequately addressed the issues and reached the correct conclusion on each of the three issues. We, therefore, adopt the opinion of the Court of Appeals and affirm both the Court of Appeals and the district court. See Supreme Court Rule 7.042(c) and (f) (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 51).

[310]*310Gernon, J., not participating. Larson, S.J., assigned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI