State v. Manlove

New Mexico Court of Appeals

State v. Manlove

1973 NMCA 109, 512 P.2d 1274, 85 N.M. 438

CourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 18, 1973

DocketNo. 1121

StatusPublished

This text of 1973 NMCA 109 (State v. Manlove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Manlove, 1973 NMCA 109, 512 P.2d 1274, 85 N.M. 438 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

This is a Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93), N.M. S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 4)] case, an appeal from denial of defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment of conviction and sentence set forth in State v. Manlove, 79 N.M. 189, 441 P.2d 229 (Ct.App.1968).

Defendant claims (1) there was a merger of offenses and he was improperly punished for three separate offenses; (2) the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury.

The matters urged for reversal are ones which have already been decided or should have been submitted to this court on the original appeal. State v. Sedillo, 84 N.M. 293, 502 P.2d 318 (Ct.App.1972).

Affirmed.

It is so ordered.

HENDLEY and HERNANDEZ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI