State v. Maniacol
This text of 97 So. 37 (State v. Maniacol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a conviction and sentence for unlawfully having intoxicating liquor in his possession for sale for beverage purposes. The state has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the record contains no bill of exception, motion for a new trial, motion in arrest of judgment, nor assignment of error, nor any error patent on the face of the papers. We find the record to be as stated in the motion to dismiss. This, however, does not warrant the dismissal of the appeal, but is a good ground for affirming the judgment. The motion to dismiss the 'appeal is therefore denied, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 So. 37, 153 La. 1053, 1923 La. LEXIS 1869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maniacol-la-1923.