State v. Manhattan Transit Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State v. Manhattan Transit Co.

58 A.D.2d 758, 395 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12910

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 7, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 A.D.2d 758 (State v. Manhattan Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Manhattan Transit Co., 58 A.D.2d 758, 395 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, entered on March 17, 1977, granting plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and denying defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of vacating the preliminary injunction and ordering an immediate trial on the issues raised by this litigation, the parties having joined in a request therefor at the time of oral argument. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. On this record we conclude that plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated a clear legal right to the ultimate relief sought. (De Candido v Young Stars, 10 AD2d 922.) Concur—Birns, J. P., Evans, Capozzoli and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, entered on March 17, 1977, granting plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and denying defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of vacating the preliminary injunction and ordering an immediate trial on the issues raised by this litigation, the parties having joined in a request therefor at the time of oral argument. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. On this record we conclude that plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated a clear legal right to the ultimate relief sought. (De Candido v Young Stars, 10 AD2d 922.) Concur—Birns, J. P., Evans, Capozzoli and Markewich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 758, 395 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-manhattan-transit-co-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack