State v. Mangual
27 A.3d 368, 302 Conn. 916
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Ada MANGUAL.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Alice Osedach, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 129 Conn.App. 638, 21 A.3d 510, is granted, limited to the following issue:
*369 "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was not in custody for purposes of Miranda when a police officer interrogated her during the execution of a search warrant on her residence?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mangual, 27 A.3d 368, 302 Conn. 916 (Colo. 2011).
27 A.3d 368 (State v. Mangual) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ramos v. Commissioner of Correction
159 A.3d 1174 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2017)
Morquecho v. Commissioner of Correction
138 A.3d 424 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2016)
State v. Mangual
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2014
Holloway v. Commissioner of Correction
77 A.3d 777 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
Coward v. Commissioner of Correction
70 A.3d 1152 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
Streater v. Commissioner of Correction
68 A.3d 155 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
Burgos-Torres v. Commissioner of Correction
64 A.3d 1259 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
State v. Pierce
27 A.3d 368 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)