State v. Mangano
This text of 961 So. 2d 1163 (State v. Mangano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Salvador MANGANO and Mabel Mangano.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ denied. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a new deadline for filing writs related to the initial motion to quash when the state failed to file its writ application or request an extension within the original deadline granted by the trial judge. The "alternative" issues in the second motion were included in the first motion. The writ application in all respects is therefore denied.
JOHNSON, J., would grant.
KNOLL, J., would grant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
961 So. 2d 1163, 2007 WL 2428490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mangano-la-2007.