State v. Manfredi

493 A.2d 242, 4 Conn. App. 247, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1021
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided May 28, 1985·No. 4170; 4171·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On the basis of the record presented to us, we conclude that the trial court erred in granting the closure order without holding an evidentiary hearing in accordance with the procedure and principles enunciated in State v. Couture, 37 Conn. Sup. 705, 435 A.2d 369 (1981). Accordingly, the order of the trial court is set aside and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Manfredi, 493 A.2d 242, 4 Conn. App. 247, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1021 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).

493 A.2d 242 (State v. Manfredi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
721 A.2d 154 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)
State v. Kelly
695 A.2d 1 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1997)