State v. Mancusi

609 So. 2d 177, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12532, 1992 WL 373163
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 1992·No. No. 91-0186·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We issued our opinion in the companion case regarding Michael Mancusi’s malicious prosecution claim against Alamo Rent-A-Car in Alamo Rent-A-Car Inc. v. Mancu-si, 599 So.2d 1010 (Fla, 4th DCA 1992). In that case we reversed a final judgment entered in favor of Mancusi and remanded for a new trial. Id. at 1013. We also determined that section 768.73(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1989) did not apply to limit punitive damages that may be awarded on remand. Id.

The instant appeal concerns the trial court’s post judgment order which determined that section 768.73(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), was unconstitutional. The Florida Supreme Court has recently held section 768.73(2)(b) to be constitutional. Gordon v. State, 608 So.2d 800 (Fla.1992). Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order and note that on remand § 768.73(2)(b) would apply.1

REVERSED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., POLEN, J., and DOWNEY, JAMES C., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mancusi, 609 So. 2d 177, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12532, 1992 WL 373163 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

609 So. 2d 177 (State v. Mancusi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gordon v. State
608 So. 2d 800 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Mancusi
599 So. 2d 1010 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)