State v. Manalasay

702 So. 2d 282, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13680, 1997 WL 756632
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 1997·No. No. 97-1059·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals a motion to suppress a short cut straw, which an officer observed in a vehicle and seized, after pulling appellee over for an expired vehicle tag. Although short eut straws are often used in drug activity, they are not, in and of themselves, sufficient to constitute probable cause for a search. Anderson v. State, 532 So.2d 4 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). See also Caplan v. State, 531 So.2d 88 (Fla.1988) (mere observation of hand rolled cigarettes in an automobile does not constitute probable cause). If there had been a connection between the reason the vehicle was pulled over and the straw, there would have been probable cause. State v. Neumann, 567 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (short straw in automobile constitutes probable cause where defendant was pulled over for appearing to be driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs).

Affirmed.

POLEN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Manalasay, 702 So. 2d 282, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13680, 1997 WL 756632 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

702 So. 2d 282 (State v. Manalasay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caplan v. State
531 So. 2d 88 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
State v. Neumann
567 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Anderson v. State
532 So. 2d 4 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)