State v. Manalasay
This text of 702 So. 2d 282 (State v. Manalasay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state appeals a motion to suppress a short cut straw, which an officer observed in a vehicle and seized, after pulling appellee over for an expired vehicle tag. Although short eut straws are often used in drug activity, they are not, in and of themselves, sufficient to constitute probable cause for a search. Anderson v. State, 532 So.2d 4 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). See also Caplan v. State, 531 So.2d 88 (Fla.1988) (mere observation of hand rolled cigarettes in an automobile does not constitute probable cause). If there had been a connection between the reason the vehicle was pulled over and the straw, there would have been probable cause. State v. Neumann, 567 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (short straw in automobile constitutes probable cause where defendant was pulled over for appearing to be driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
702 So. 2d 282, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13680, 1997 WL 756632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-manalasay-fladistctapp-1997.