State v. Malone (supplemental opinion)

309 Neb. 399, 959 N.W.2d 818
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided June 4, 2021·No. S-20-118, S-20-460·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 08/27/2021 08:10 AM CDT

- 399 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. MALONE Cite as 309 Neb. 399

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Kevin W. Malone, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed June 4, 2021. Nos. S-20-118, S-20-460.

supplemental opinion

Appeals from the District Court for Douglas County: Shelly R. Stratman, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.

Richard L. Boucher and Bradley H. Supernaw, of Boucher Law Firm, for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Melissa R. Vincent for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam. This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Kevin W. Malone, concerning our opinion in State v. Malone, 308 Neb. 929, 957 N.W.2d 892 (2021). We find no substantive merit to Malone’s motion and overrule it, but modify the opinion as follows:

In the analysis section, under the heading “2. Postconvic­ tion Relief” and the subheading “(b) Claim of Prosecutorial Mis­conduct,” id. at 962, 957 N.W.2d at 920, we withdraw the second paragraph and substitute the following:

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. MALONE Cite as 309 Neb. 399

The district court first rejected this argument as procedurally barred. However, Malone had amended his motion to add an allegation that his appellate counsel had been ineffective for failing to raise the claims of prosecutorial misconduct on direct appeal. The district court alternatively rejected Malone’s claim, reasoning that even if not procedurally barred, the claim failed to “set forth the facts and applicable law to establish an objection based on any of these prosecutorial [misconduct] claims would . . . have been successful.” We agree. The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Malone (supplemental opinion), 309 Neb. 399, 959 N.W.2d 818 (Neb. 2021).

309 Neb. 399 (State v. Malone (supplemental opinion)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mata
Nebraska Supreme Court, 2026
In re Interest of Bosileo D.
Nebraska Supreme Court, 2026
State v. Boswell
316 Neb. 542 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
State v. Abram
Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2024
State v. Mabior
994 N.W.2d 65 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2023)
State v. Devers
986 N.W.2d 747 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2023)
State v. Vanderford
980 N.W.2d 397 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2022)
State v. Lotter
976 N.W.2d 721 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2022)
State v. Pineda
Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2022
State v. Betancourt-Garcia
967 N.W.2d 111 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2021)