State v. Malone

879 N.E.2d 781, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1472
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 23, 2008·No. 2007-2186·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Marion App. No. 9-06-43, 2007-Ohio-5484. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed November 15, 2007:

“Is a conviction for intimidation of a witness under R.C. 2921.04(B), which requires the witness to be involved in a criminal action or proceeding, sustainable where the intimidation occurred after the criminal act but prior to any police investigation of the criminal act, and thus, also prior to any proceedings flowing from the criminal act in a court of justice?”

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

The conflict cases are State v. Gooden, Cuyahoga App. No. 82621, 2004-Ohio-2699, and State v. Hummell (June 1, 1998), Morrow App. No. CA-851.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Malone, 879 N.E.2d 781, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1472 (Ohio 2008).

879 N.E.2d 781 (State v. Malone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Osie (Slip Opinion)
2014 Ohio 2966 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2014)
State v. Malone
903 N.E.2d 614 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)