State v. Main

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Main

124 A. 401, 100 Conn. 749, 1924 Conn. LEXIS 78

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 8, 1924·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The accused moved the court to set aside the verdict on the ground that it was against the evidence; the court denied the motion and the accused appealed. The evidence was conflicting, and we cannot review the credibility of witnesses nor the weight of testimony, nor hold in this case that the jury could not *750 reasonably have rendered the verdict they did. Upon this record there was no remote possibility that this appeal could be sustained unless out’ long-established rule controlling appeals of this character should be set aside. State v. Laudano, 74 Conn. 638, 51 Atl. 860; Chesebro v. Lockwood, 88 Conn. 220, 91 Atl. 188; Schleifenbaum v. Rundbaken, 81 Conn. 623, 71 Atl. 899; Root v. New Haven Trust Co., 82 Conn. 600, 74 Atl. 950.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The accused moved the court to set aside the verdict on the ground that it was against the evidence; the court denied the motion and the accused appealed. The evidence was conflicting, and we cannot review the credibility of witnesses nor the weight of testimony, nor hold in this case that the jury could not *750 reasonably have rendered the verdict they did. Upon this record there was no remote possibility that this appeal could be sustained unless out’ long-established rule controlling appeals of this character should be set aside. State v. Laudano, 74 Conn. 638, 51 Atl. 860; Chesebro v. Lockwood, 88 Conn. 220, 91 Atl. 188; Schleifenbaum v. Rundbaken, 81 Conn. 623, 71 Atl. 899; Root v. New Haven Trust Co., 82 Conn. 600, 74 Atl. 950.

There is no error.

State v. Main, 124 A. 401, 100 Conn. 749, 1924 Conn. LEXIS 78 (Colo. 1924).

Pincite

124 A. 401 (State v. Main) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related