State v. Main

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Main

124 A. 401, 100 Conn. 749, 1924 Conn. LEXIS 78

DecidedMay 8, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 124 A. 401 (State v. Main) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Main, 124 A. 401, 100 Conn. 749, 1924 Conn. LEXIS 78 (Colo. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The accused moved the court to set aside the verdict on the ground that it was against the evidence; the court denied the motion and the accused appealed. The evidence was conflicting, and we cannot review the credibility of witnesses nor the weight of testimony, nor hold in this case that the jury could not *750 reasonably have rendered the verdict they did. Upon this record there was no remote possibility that this appeal could be sustained unless out’ long-established rule controlling appeals of this character should be set aside. State v. Laudano, 74 Conn. 638, 51 Atl. 860; Chesebro v. Lockwood, 88 Conn. 220, 91 Atl. 188; Schleifenbaum v. Rundbaken, 81 Conn. 623, 71 Atl. 899; Root v. New Haven Trust Co., 82 Conn. 600, 74 Atl. 950.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The accused moved the court to set aside the verdict on the ground that it was against the evidence; the court denied the motion and the accused appealed. The evidence was conflicting, and we cannot review the credibility of witnesses nor the weight of testimony, nor hold in this case that the jury could not *750 reasonably have rendered the verdict they did. Upon this record there was no remote possibility that this appeal could be sustained unless out’ long-established rule controlling appeals of this character should be set aside. State v. Laudano, 74 Conn. 638, 51 Atl. 860; Chesebro v. Lockwood, 88 Conn. 220, 91 Atl. 188; Schleifenbaum v. Rundbaken, 81 Conn. 623, 71 Atl. 899; Root v. New Haven Trust Co., 82 Conn. 600, 74 Atl. 950.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 A. 401, 100 Conn. 749, 1924 Conn. LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-main-conn-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack