State v. Maheras

246 P. 304, 42 Idaho 544, 1926 Ida. LEXIS 98
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedMay 28, 1926
StatusPublished

This text of 246 P. 304 (State v. Maheras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Maheras, 246 P. 304, 42 Idaho 544, 1926 Ida. LEXIS 98 (Idaho 1926).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Attorney General confesses error on the ground that after the cause was submitted to them for consideration the jury separated. The record shows that such was the situation and the prosecuting attorney made no counter-showing before the .trial court. Prejudice is thereby presumed. (C. S., sec. 9017; State v. Chacon, 36 Ida. 148, 209 Pac. 889.) Therefore the cause is reversed and remanded with instruction to grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Chacon
209 P. 889 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 P. 304, 42 Idaho 544, 1926 Ida. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maheras-idaho-1926.