State v. Maher

35 Me. 225
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 35 Me. 225 (State v. Maher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Maher, 35 Me. 225 (Me. 1853).

Opinion

Wells, J.

— The Judge of the Police Court of Gardiner had authority to impose the fine of twenty dollars, by virtue of the “ Act for the suppression of drinking houses and tippling shops,” approved June 2, 1851, c. 211, § 5. It is therefore unnecessary to determine whether the Act incorporating the city of Gardiner conferred the same power.

It was the duty of the Judge of the Police Court to amend his record, and the act appears to have been sufficiently described by its title.

The indictment and conviction of the defendant as a common seller, embracing the time in which this offence is charged, are no objection to this prosecution, for they are different offences. The violation of the law in a single case is an offence: where there is evidence of several violations, they show another and more aggravated one of being a common seller, which implies a general and continued breach of the law. State v. Coombs, 32 Maine, 529.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Yasin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2019
People v. Faden
3 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)
State v. Marchindo
211 P. 1093 (Montana Supreme Court, 1922)
State v. Morehead
47 A. 545 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Me. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maher-me-1853.