State v. Maharaj

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Maharaj. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Haw. 215
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 5, 2013·No. 29520·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29520 05-MAR-2013 11:15 AM SCWC-29520

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

PETER NEWAL MAHARAJ, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 29520; HPD Traffic No. 1DTA-08-03393)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on January

21, 2013 by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Peter Newal Maharaj is

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 5, 2013.

Leslie C. Maharaj, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Maharaj, (haw 2013).

State v. Maharaj (State v. Maharaj) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.