State v. Mahaney

492 S.W.3d 628, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 619, 2016 WL 3418339
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 2016·No. No. ED 103413·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Defendant Alice Mahaney (“Mahaney”) appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of Jefferson County after the trial court found her guilty of the class A misdemeanor of harassment in violation of Section 565.090, RSMo 2000. In her sole point on appeal, Mahaney contends that the trial court erred in overruling her motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of evidence and entering judgment against her because the State’s evidence was insufficient to sustain a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mahaney, 492 S.W.3d 628, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 619, 2016 WL 3418339 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

492 S.W.3d 628 (State v. Mahaney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.