State v. Magee

142 P.3d 123, 207 Or. App. 637, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1339
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 6, 2006·No. 03FE1129MA; A124799·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of, among other offenses, one count of attempted burglary (with intent to commit harassment) and one count of attempted burglary (with intent to commit menacing). ORS 164.225; ORS 161.405. Defendant argues that the two attempted burglaries — both based on a single attempted entry — should have merged into a single conviction for attempted burglary. The state concedes that the trial court erred in failing to merge the convictions. State v. Barrett, 331 Or 27, 10 P3d 901 (2000). We agree and accept the concession.1

Reversed and remanded with instructions to merge convictions for attempted burglary and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Magee, 142 P.3d 123, 207 Or. App. 637, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1339 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

142 P.3d 123 (State v. Magee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Barrett
10 P.3d 901 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2000)