State v. Magee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Magee

202 N.W.2d 632, 294 Minn. 555, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1466

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 27, 1972·No. No. 43080·Published

Opinion

Per' Curiam.

Defendant contends on appeal from a judgment' of conviction of first-degree manslaughter, Minn. St. 609.20, that (1) police violated his Fourth Amendment rights, (2) he did not receive a fair trial, and (3) the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the verdict in that the state did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that his act of firing a revolver directly into a threatening crowd of people in a drinking and dancing establishment was not justifiable. We Have carefully reviewed the record and find no reversible error and that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per' Curiam.

Defendant contends on appeal from a judgment' of conviction of first-degree manslaughter, Minn. St. 609.20, that (1) police violated his Fourth Amendment rights, (2) he did not receive a fair trial, and (3) the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the verdict in that the state did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that his act of firing a revolver directly into a threatening crowd of people in a drinking and dancing establishment was not justifiable. We Have carefully reviewed the record and find no reversible error and that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction.

Affirmed.

State v. Magee, 202 N.W.2d 632, 294 Minn. 555, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1466 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

202 N.W.2d 632 (State v. Magee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.