State v. M.A.G.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. M.A.G.

723 So. 2d 390, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13, 1999 WL 2707

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 6, 1999

DocketNo. 98-01087

StatusPublished

This text of 723 So. 2d 390 (State v. M.A.G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. M.A.G., 723 So. 2d 390, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13, 1999 WL 2707 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PATTERSON, Acting Chief Judge.

The State appeals from a final disposition order which suspends M.A.G.’s driver’s license for six months. The State contends [391]*391that M.AG.’s driving privileges should have been suspended for two years, pursuant to section 322.056, Florida Statutes (1997). For the reasons stated in State v. M.L.R., No. 98-01096, 722 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), we hold that a two-year suspension is mandatory pursuant to section 322.056 because M.A.G. was adjudicated delinquent for a “subsequent violation” regarding an alcohol, drug, or tobacco offense. Accordingly, we reverse the disposition order and remand for the trial court to enter a disposition order that directs the Department of Highway, Safety and Motor Vehicles to suspend M.A.G.’s driving privileges for two years.

Reversed and remanded.

ALTENBERND and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PATTERSON, Acting Chief Judge.

The State appeals from a final disposition order which suspends M.A.G.’s driver’s license for six months. The State contends [391]*391that M.AG.’s driving privileges should have been suspended for two years, pursuant to section 322.056, Florida Statutes (1997). For the reasons stated in State v. M.L.R., No. 98-01096, 722 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), we hold that a two-year suspension is mandatory pursuant to section 322.056 because M.A.G. was adjudicated delinquent for a “subsequent violation” regarding an alcohol, drug, or tobacco offense. Accordingly, we reverse the disposition order and remand for the trial court to enter a disposition order that directs the Department of Highway, Safety and Motor Vehicles to suspend M.A.G.’s driving privileges for two years.

Reversed and remanded.

ALTENBERND and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

723 So. 2d 390, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13, 1999 WL 2707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mag-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack