State v. Maes
120 S.E. 576, 127 S.C. 397, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 292
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The elaborate and lucid decree of Judge Smith in this case, renders further discussion of the questions raised a work of supererogation. For the reasons -assigned by him, the judgment is affirmed. Let the order be reported.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Maes, 120 S.E. 576, 127 S.C. 397, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 292 (S.C. 1923).
120 S.E. 576 (State v. Maes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. King
69 S.E.2d 123 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1952)
State v. White
61 S.E.2d 754 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1950)
Mason v. Cochran, Sheriff
46 So. 2d 106 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1950)
State v. Cook
28 S.E.2d 842 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1944)
Orick v. State
105 So. 465 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1925)
State v. Foxworth
125 S.E. 131 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1924)
State v. Brown
124 S.E. 87 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1924)