State v. Madison

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Madison

789 S.W.2d 81, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 429, 1990 WL 29807

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 1990·No. No. 53928·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of the Class C felony of stealing more than $150 and the resultant sentence by the court of fifteen years as a persistent offender. He also appeals from the denial of his post-conviction motion pursuant to Rule 29.15. We find no error in either judgment and conclude that no precedential value would be served by an opinion. The parties have been furnished with a statement delineating our reasons for our result. Judgments are affirmed. Rule 30.-25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of the Class C felony of stealing more than $150 and the resultant sentence by the court of fifteen years as a persistent offender. He also appeals from the denial of his post-conviction motion pursuant to Rule 29.15. We find no error in either judgment and conclude that no precedential value would be served by an opinion. The parties have been furnished with a statement delineating our reasons for our result. Judgments are affirmed. Rule 30.-25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Madison, 789 S.W.2d 81, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 429, 1990 WL 29807 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

789 S.W.2d 81 (State v. Madison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.